Ask the Lawyer received the following question (paraphrased for easier reading and clarity) from a reader on a legal matter that might be of interest to the entire audience.
I am a division chief and my employees requested a desk audit to determine if their grade levels were appropriate. After the third party auditor determined their grades were correct, I provided a rebuttal, as I believed the auditor did not have all of the facts. My employees are moving forward with EEO complaints. My office director had been identifying HR as rejecting the grade increases but the HR person said it was my director’s move. When questioned, my director said he took my rebuttal to the desk audit and changed it, but there was no notice to me that this was done. Is this action acceptable within OPM regulations?
It may be within OPM regulations because management decides how to describe the job duties in a position description. The changing of documents and hiding information could prove problematic for management as it deals with the EEO process.
Bill Bransford is managing partner of Shaw, Bransford & Roth, PC.
Disclaimer: Ask a Lawyer publishes information on this website for informational purposes only. Information on this website is intended – but not promised, guaranteed, or warranted – to reflect correct, complete and current developments. In addition, the contents of the website do not constitute legal advice and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the attorney. Information from this website is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based on information on this website without seeking specific legal advice about your particular circumstances. No attorney-client relationship between you and Ask a Lawyer’s author is created by the transmission of information to or from this site.